Research
Methods and results for evaluating LLM systems with calibrated judges
Reading order: Start with the CJE paper and the validated work below. Everything else is grouped by status: work in progress, then essays and positions.
Preprint • December 2025
Causal Judge Evaluation: Calibrated Surrogate Metrics for LLM Systems
Reward calibration, transport audits, and calibration-aware inference. On 4,961 Arena prompts, CJE makes Direct + two-stage calibration the default. With a stronger model's ratings standing in for human labels, the paper's cost model gives a 14× reduction relative to full labeling (arXiv v3).
Erratum: after a fix to the calibration-aware variance, a re-run of the Arena benchmark gives 93.9% confidence-interval coverage for Direct and 95.6% for Direct with covariates, higher than the coverage reported in arXiv v3. Re-run details
Validated
Empirical results traceable to reproducible artifacts.
In Progress
Real questions with incomplete formalizations.
Essays & Positions
Lenses and positions, not validated results.
